65 Comments
User's avatar
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

The moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet are paying the "doctors" to pump the jabs.

We Had Better Solve for the Psychopaths in Control NOW! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/we-had-better-solve-for-the-psychopaths

Expand full comment
Steve Miller's avatar

The evil perpetrated the world is obvious, it shames me to live well, as the children will never know the youth I had, much less adult life. Truly evil 😮‍💨

Expand full comment
jennifer dibley's avatar

Absolutely true. even with dysfunctional parents it was better than what these kids will have

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

Drugs used to be withdrawn, when far fewer injuries and deaths occurred. Now a massive amount of studies have shown there is a definite correlation between the injections and the diseases that are occurring.

Worldwide countries, such as, Denmark,, Germany, Japan, etc., have come up with disturbing health information, which should be heeded. They have experienced horrific results, but no government is stopping these disease-creating vaccines. It is mind boggling to think that toxic injections with poisonous substances are still being promoted, when so many have been injured or died, because of them. The world leaders enable the psychopaths in Big Pharma to continue on destroying men, women and children.

Expand full comment
RAY FALCIOLA's avatar

Perhaps use of the word "drugs" should be discarded so we can see them for what they are

Profitable commodities protected by patents and controlled by organizations that will shove them down your throat whether you want them or not and whether they work or not.

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

AGREED! Deadly products whose producer's agenda is designed to benefit its pocketbook and lower the population at the same time.

Expand full comment
Elaine's avatar

The world leaders are also psychopaths.

Expand full comment
John T's avatar

I had similar symptoms for about a week. I believe it was from a shedding incident. I haven't received any of the shots. It was like muscle spasms on steroids the pain part of it.

Expand full comment
Gary’S's avatar

Iatrogenic diseases are becoming both increasingly common and normalized. And the vast majority of people still trust the medical-science-pharmaceutical-insurance-industrial complex. Stupid people and evil leaders. What a classic combination!

Expand full comment
Moorea Maguire's avatar

I think you just captured our current world in a nutshell, Gary.

Expand full comment
Jayna Dinnyes's avatar

I term it BIG HARMA A.K.A. NOTHEALTHCARE, THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, AND THE MSM UNDER THE CHRISTIAN VATICAN IN ROME! Now, it's "The Genocidal Killing of the Willing!" 😲

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

I see 'stupid people' anagrams to 'ie despot pulp'. Sounds just right. There's more:

- lo die puppets

- put pile dopes

Expand full comment
Gary’S's avatar

I wish that I could “like” this comment a lot more times than once.

Expand full comment
richard noakes's avatar

Actually, the vaccines were never about curing people, they were about making investors in WHO richer than they already are and the more people they got vaccinated, the more money they got paid by doing so - so if you were injured or are now dead, well, you did not matter, you served your purpose which was to be exterminated as Human Rubbish while making those who invested in WHO considerably richer and you still can, for the same reasons now, the next time you have another vaccine:

The WHO offers donors a 3,400% return on investment, openly promoting “at least $35 for every $1 invested.”

WHO’s Directing Global Health Policy?”

Published by the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS), June 2025

Purpose of the Report

This independent investigation by AMPS critically examines the World Health Organization’s (WHO) funding mechanisms, focusing on the top-100 non-country donors to the WHO’s voluntary contributions for specified purposes in 2022–2023. The report aims to evaluate whether these funding arrangements compromise the WHO’s independence, especially given its central role in new global health treaties such as:

The 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).

The WHO Pandemic Treaty/Agreement.

Key Findings

Donor Influence and Return on Investment

The WHO offers donors a 3,400% return on investment, openly promoting “at least $35 for every $1 invested.”

Ian Brighthope

Dr. Vernon Coleman: How Drug Companies Bribed Doctors to Vaccinate, Vaccinate and Vaccinate

How sad it is that doctors have sold themselves, and now conspire against the people they have sworn to protect.

Lioness of Judah Ministry

Jun 25, 2025

Me: For investors to get their $35 profit on each $1 spent, they have to force us Human Rubbish to take Big Pharma's products and vaccines and to be exterminated, sooner or later, by a multitude of methods, including Cancers.

Should you wish to make these rich people and companies even richer, by donating your life, then go ahead, make their day and become a GMO with zero Human Rights, or dead, or for anything else Big Pharma comes up with, like "wearables" with the same ultimate intention, to GMO and exterminate us for their money and profit.

So if each investor invests $100 for your free vaccine shot, they are paid "at least" $3,500 back, after your free vaccine injection, multiplied by the numbers of free vaccine shots, they invested in, from the outset. Money for Jam - but if nobody gets a vaccine, then the investors don't make any money, or get anything paid back, do they - so how to get the maximum number of vaccinations made, to make their original investments, pay out handsomely?

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

Can we say the profit is greatest for the elderly saving the government millions on medicare costs?

Expand full comment
richard noakes's avatar

Hi Dee Dee - Yes, I'd say that improvement probably applies when they have the vaccines, it does not matter which one, as they all have the same general purpose in mind. I'm 78 but I refused all vaccines but if I'd had any, I would be dead now and unable to grace your substack with my feeble offerings.

Expand full comment
Rebal's avatar

My own son, 6’4, was also affected.

Leg and foot and hand.

No worries, they said. Fell down the stairs and tore muscles around his knee.

Expand full comment
Moorea Maguire's avatar

I'm sorry that happened to your son. I hope he's okay.

Expand full comment
Rebal's avatar

Yes, he's pretty determined. Took six months before he gave in and saw a Dr for it. He wouldn't talk about it anymore when I started asking questions.

They worked on skeleton crew, let others go, he had kids to feed, so did what they told him. Got pretty sick w the bug a few times, as did another son-firefighter. They were also required, bc they saw so many people everyday. He said most were drug overdoses at that time. Unusual for that area.

Regardless, with Gods provision, they are holding strong.

Thank you, for your kind words :)

Expand full comment
Moorea Maguire's avatar

I'm so glad your sons are holding strong. The vaccine mandates were and are an injustice.

Expand full comment
Rebal's avatar

In full agreement. I worked LTC and hospital during the brunt of it...most horrific time in my entire life. Went home crying everyday. Tears saved for the car. Thank goodness for the wonderful angelic choir late evenings when I stopped to drop in front of the alter after many very, very long, trying days. And wr didn't have a lot of the bug at all, just change in protocol and research and covering shifts for those who many not have even had symptoms, but twice weekly per testing always revealed someone had it. Most often, not the managers, who carried the weight.

Was a horrific time. We will never forget. Many spoke out and were silenced; deplatformed, words changed even while typing, not even allowed to join my fb church services or Easter Bible Study-simply woukd get in and removed.

To this day, I cannot order from Amazon. "We cant say why but we cant restore your account", the frustrated customer service rep said.

It forever changed our lives. Forever, my rose colored glasses are ashen.

Expand full comment
RAY FALCIOLA's avatar

So what's the hold up on stopping mRNA injections?

Well you know, they need a little more time, perhaps decades to find out what the mRNA injections WON'T cause.

That list is getting pretty short since mRNA is proving to be capable of causing almost any malady you can imagine. After all, it is gene modification and modified genes changes the programs of life. Programmers know, little glitches can cause BIG and unpredictable problems. We already know those gene modifying mRNA buggers go almost anywhere in the body. The possibilities are exciting eh?

But right now the problems are not their problem. The problem is to maximize the looting while the free for all is still in place. Can't depend on EUA forever you know. Perhaps next installation cycle they won't be able to install the right people to keep the profitable disaster going.

So they're starting to get a handle on what mRNA WON'T cause but the list is not yet definitive

And for sure they want to be deliberative and definitive about what they know. They don't want to make the same mistakes as when they launched this product. They launched it pretending to know nothing of the consequences (never mind that hiding the data stuff). They need to show deliberative systematic evaluation to regain our trust.

Perhaps a few more decades till they can decide if it is prudent to pull mRNA. You need to have a handle on things when you do stuff like stop the windfall looting. Heads will roll if you stop the looting and money is left on the table. Screw the dead and harmed, they're protected from that but there is no protection from failing to return shareholder value.

They need to know for example esoteric things like

"mRNA may cause MANY turbo cancers but can it cause turbo cancers of the toenail?"

Don't want to stop an important study like that prematurely. Not while the money is rolling in.

When they get their definitive answers they'll take the hit if necessary and stop the looting and harm because they aren't savages like those guys who launched the product.

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

LOL you got me there, turbo cancers of the toenail!

Expand full comment
Moorea Maguire's avatar

Thanks for the laugh! This would be even funnier if it weren't true.

Expand full comment
Jayna Dinnyes's avatar

Yes, Ray. And what about the jabbed victims' SHEDDING as promised to all of us from Pfizer? 😲

Expand full comment
RAY FALCIOLA's avatar

One hopes that shedding is not a concern. Some people assert that the idea of airborne COVIC pandemics is fake or at least deceptive because air borne contagion is repeatedly shown to be not a real thing. IE, being in a elevator with a COVID person is not the issue fear porn would dictate. And my own experience is when I got COVID early on I can point to no source of contagion as I was quite isolated at the time (still am), on the other hand I've been around active COVID many times since and never got it again. Perhaps I got my "immunity" who knows. I'm NOT an authority on contagion issues. It may not be a concern for casual contact but one would assume it may be a serious issue for sexual partners. I doubt I'd worry about every day shedding any more than I would worry about getting AIDS from being around lots of people with AIDS. But intimate contact is a different situation. So who knows. Maybe there is something of concern in shedding. I would hope not.

Whatever the case one knows that the perpetrators are down with anything that forces compliance consensual or not even if it is stealth else there would not be so much interest and research on critter delivery (ticks, mosquitoes etc) and aerosol deliveries. Shedding, if real or not is win win because if nothing else it is REALLY useful for fear porn. From a Bill Gates type perpetrator perspective whatever gets you poisoned (mind or body) is a good thing. Self amplifying mRNA for example holds the promise of much longer spike protein presence making it near impossible to follow reasonable "intuitive" (even if not proven) anti-shedding rules that may dictate "no sex for 3 months" or whatever.. AT EVERY TURN they are scheming to get the poisons in us. And if that fails they want to get inside our heads. Best case is they accomplish both. Not paranoia. Just documented facts with reasonable speculation following documented behavior during the lead up and counter measures phases of the COVID operation.

Probably the biggest negative of shedding for the perpetrators is the loss of opportunity to loot by forcing a assault victim to pay for the assault. Of course it is irrelevant next to the fact that in the end game as the assaulted victim's health fails the medical and government complex will loot all you have as you exit penniless trying to survive what's been done. Intentionally bankrupting people then confiscating all they have is a time honored way to loot.

Expand full comment
Jayna Dinnyes's avatar

Well Ray . . .In Pfizer's forced-released papers (paraphrased a little by me) is stated : "We only need to vaccinate 35% of the population; they will do the rest.

Through the air they breathe and though touch blood clots will form." The vascular doctors now treat blood clot victims with their totally expensive drugs like Pfizer's Eliquis. But not me! I take Nattokinase (natural Japanese blood thinner) with a Solaray Cool Cayenne capsule. (Cayenne helps the body to absorb other meds.) I heard that the Covid virus was contained in chem trails. ??? I post publicly on MeWe.

Expand full comment
jennifer dibley's avatar

I think if people sit in your car or in your home and they are sweating then they are shedding

Expand full comment
Danyèle's avatar

Thank you for sharing this information!

What about a study of the un-vaxxed exposed to shedding or having taken the RT-PCR Covid test?

Expand full comment
St. Alia the Knife's avatar

Big pHarma is full court press on the mRNA platform and like the Terminator absolutely will not stop, no matter what. Thomas Renz posited that they are willing to sacrifice all or most of the current vaccines in order to make mRNA the only choice. There are HUNDREDS more in the pipeline. They are willing to sacrifice millions of lives and damage hundreds of millions of people to accomplish these ends. Pfizer is paying for ads about afib. They will gladly develop all kinds of expensive "treatments" (never cures) for the damage they reap. Pure evil! Jail is too good for these people. They should "volunteer" to test each and every one of these proposed jabs. Make them back up their words with actions. If they are truly safe then no problem!

Expand full comment
Rebal's avatar

Thats fine. Nobody wants any of that anyway. How were we before all that? Seems they want to destroy anything of God, or rewrite it. These people are not right in the head or the heart. Maybe they aren't even human.

Expand full comment
Moorea Maguire's avatar

Thanks so much for sharing this important study, Dee.

Expand full comment
Mog's avatar

Yes. People were persuaded they were being given a health protecting intervention. The truth is, they were given a military developed countermeasure, aka bioweapon. It is time everyone understood there was a military Coup D'etat of all governments whereby public health was sidelined by mysterious/secret special units who usurped the laws of all participating countries. Now, who could facilitated that? Do you think you can identify who/what is our real enemy? (It's not a phantom germ.)

Expand full comment
Jayna Dinnyes's avatar

Yes! They are BIG HARMA A.K.A. NOT HEALTH CARE, THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, AND THR MSM UNDER THE CHRISTIAN VATICAN IN ROME! 😲

Expand full comment
Olivier D's avatar

They knew - governments knew, all over the word

Expand full comment
Sez77's avatar

"Post-authorization surveillance on adverse effects of vaccination is highly valuable for further investigation".

Be even more valuable if they did it PRE-authorisation to ensure their poisons weren't going to kill and injure people (you know, like we used to do in the olden days, before deciding we'd do minimal testing and instead just roll these things out and see what happens).

Sarcasm aside, NAC seems to be particularly effective at resolving small fibre neuropathy. I developed it in my arm on the left side, then it started in my left foot and began creeping up my lower leg. Two weeks on NAC and it was gone, never to return, and that was 3 years ago.

Expand full comment
Rebal's avatar

Good to know. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Elaine's avatar

I saw my pulmonary doctor on July 2 for arthritic nodules on my lungs. She asked me if I had gotten all of my vaccines. I looked at her with amazement and asked her how she could still be pushing for these after all of the evidence the jabs are killers and created so many serious health issues. She said the literature (meaning the literature given out by the CDC) proves them to be safe and effective. I still can't believe this woman is so utterly blind. She needs to get out of the medical profession. I won't be seeing her again. By the way, she also tried to push surgery to remove the nerve in my nose as I have rhinitis. I shook my head in disgust.

Expand full comment
Jayna Dinnyes's avatar

Elaine, if your rhinitis is from an allergy like hay fever, taking Swanson Vitamins' Grapeseed Extract capsules might help.

Expand full comment
Karen E. Hetherington's avatar

Why don't you grab pliers and pull hers out of her nose.

Expand full comment
TAMMY A.'s avatar

HOLOCAUST SV40 ONGOING

Expand full comment
TAMMY A.'s avatar

RNA PCR FAMINE RADIATION WEALTH HARVEST LAND GRAB WW3

Expand full comment